'Management in Organisation Essay\r'

'A NEW military commission FOR THE UPSTAGE THEATRE\r\nThe notice of the upstage line of business Company had assembled to hear the chaste Director’s aims for the following class’s time of year. Mark burgeon forth, the Artistic Director, had strengthened a re dres sit downion on his scaffolding of popular comic seasons, and just about segments of the mature expected a similar marriage proposal this stratum.\r\nBuck entered the calling cardroom, and after a few general remarks, began to speak closely his plans for the season. As he spoke, the jump on members began to look at each separate with astonishment. Buck was proposing a radical departure with a Shakespearean catastrophe and organiseing up to a piece by Arthur Miller. At the shutting of this totally unexpected proposal he looked around at his audience. ‘Any questions’ he asked rather blandly, while privately enjoying the diaphanous bewilderment on the part of the board. He loved surprising lot!\r\n blue jean Carlisle, the chair of the board, was the only one not surprised by the proposal, as Buck had approached her several weeks ago and dropped near hints about his idea. Buck, she had a shrewd suspicion, was out to begin with to promote his own career. K right offn as a ‘ conform tody man’ starting and foremost, he was in danger of being typecast within the industry. Only by rounding out his production generate could he hope to progress.\r\nCarlisle, however, could see a lot of possibilities in the proposal for a ‘serious’ season, even though she k bracing it would be dismissed as foolhardy by a number of the established board members. Her involvement with the aloof Theatre was found on a sincere allegiance to the cultural increment of the familiarity. Lately, she had been coming on a lower floor some fire from her family and friends for not goading that much ‘culturally significant’ work be performed b y the Theatre. When she had first hear of Buck’s proposal, she had make up ones mindd to gage it and had accordingly begun to examine how best to choose the board to realise it as well.\r\n outright she turned to Robert Ramsay, a board member who had been brought in for his connections with the business community. ‘Well, Robert, it’s an enkindle proposal we have in summit of us,’ she state. ‘What do you stand for?’\r\nRamsay, she happened to know, had been considerably gangrenous in front of the board recently, as a result of his inability to hiking money for the Theatre. She also knew that much of the enemy to the corporate support of the Theatre had progress from the fact that its plays were not considered serious enough. Thus, Ramsay, she reasoned, would support the departure proposed by Buck.\r\nThis was indeed the case. ‘I think it’s a improbable idea. And I’m for certain it’s the kind of season th e financial community would support’ said Ramsay.\r\nSeveral others on the board protested strongly against the proposed season. The most crying of these was Olaf Vickers, a local playwright of some repute. Vickers had had several of his comedy works performed by the Upstage Theatre Company over the years. The argument presented by Buck, Carlisle, and Ramsay managed to quiet these objections, however, at least to the point where the board voted to canvas the marketing and financial implications of the proposal and get through again in two weeks’ time.\r\nWhen the board met again, a month later, the battle lines were more clearly drawn. Olaf Vickers spoke first. ‘I transmit that we dismiss the proposal for a â€Å"tragedy’ season,” he said. ‘The Theatre has al right smarts had a reputation for comic works, and this reputation should not be thrown away lightly. I feel that our nice director should go back and rethink his proposals.’ \r\nJean Carlisle, however, was ca-ca with an answer. ‘I know how you feel’, she said. ‘ nevertheless I think we have to consider some other factors too. For a year now our line of business has been losing money, and how long the versatile arts councils will go on funding us is an open question. As I told you last year, some of the giving medication people are very bear on that we develop more in the way of recess office support and remote funding. Now, as I see it, this proposal may give us a chance to do undecomposed that. I’ve asked Mark Buck to do an summary survey among the town’s theatre community, and I think you’ll find the results interesting.’\r\nThe artistic director now stood up. ‘We’ve been able to put together a random take of Theatre goers from the subscription lists of other theatres in town,’ he said. ‘I had a couple of people in the administrative office echo these people and do a cover poll survey of their preferences. The results indicate that a legal age would patronise a new tragedy season. So I think we can expect some box office support for this proposal.’\r\nHe sat down and amid murmurs from the board members Carlisle then asked Ramsay to manner of speaking the come across. ‘I’ve canvassed the business community,’ he said. ‘A number of corporations have indicated their interest in supporting a â€Å"serious season” here. I think it’s honorable to say that we could count on sanely generous corporate support should we decide to go in the lead.’\r\nA heated controversy followed these announcements. While many of the previously available board members now leaned toward acceptance of the proposed season, a significant minority, lead by Olaf Vickers, debate it. As the by-laws required a two- thirds majority to approve a policy change, the meeting adjourned without any ratiocination being taken. It was contumacious to meet again the following week to resolve the crisis, if possible.\r\nDuring that week, Jean Carlisle paid a visit to Olaf Vickers. After some gracious discussion of theatre matters, she came to the point. ‘You know Olaf,’ she said sadly, ‘it’s rather a pity you don’t support the proposal for a ‘serious’ season.’\r\n‘Why’s that?’ inquired the playwright suspiciously.\r\n‘Well’, explained Carlisle, ‘it’s just that I was talking to Buck the other day, and he wanted to commission you to create verbally a work to wrap up the season. He says he’s sure a serious piece by you would be just the thing to capital letter the year.’ ‘I’m glad that at least he remembers part of the Theatre’s original mandate,’ growled Vickers. ‘After all, the Upstage is supposed to be committed to the development of new local authors.’ \r\n‘And it’s a commitment he takes very seriously,’ replied Carlisle. ‘And, so do I, I can settle you. That’s why if we were to go ahead with the season he suggests, I would act as that your new play be accredited immediately. I hope we can come to some agreement when we next meet,’ she added, as she rose to go.\r\n‘Maybe,’ Vickers replied thoughtfully.\r\nAt the next meeting, Vickers proclaimed that after some thought, he had changed his Mind, and would now support the new season. Several weeks later, it was announced that as local playwright, he had been asked to draw up a serious work to be performed as season finale.\r\nQuestions\r\n1. What do you observe to be the primary problem in this case? 2. Do you believe that the board has made closes according to the rational decision making model? Why?\r\n3. Do you think that using a crowd such as this one was the most telling way to make the decision?\r\n4. What might you h ave done differently, in order to facilitate more effective decision making\r\n'