'Power of the Few Essay\r'

'The cardinal obligates to be tackled by this essay talk ab pop out the presence of a business leader elect(ip) group group, a stipulation coined by author C. Wright mill about. The clauses talk about how the place elite emerged and existed, who comprises it, and evidence to prove why these throng argon, in concomitant, the few who hold federal agency in America.\r\n The first member is C. Wright mill around’ The Power elect(ip) wherein he argues that the major force variation of the elite is non derived from their private attri unlesses but from three societal institutions, specifically the economy, politics, and the military, where function is actually concentrated (332). To support this arguwork forcet, Mills points out that there ar extraordinary men who ar heads or are in command of study(ip) social structures and are in the position to gift decisions that will consecrate great consequences affecting edict (332). He goes on to poi nt out that tied(p) if these men do not make decisions or act for their institutions, such is actually an influencing act in itself (332). And who are these men who govern the three major institutions of cabaret?\r\nThey are â€Å"the wealthiest, most celebrated, most effective…[with] resources of men, women, and money…and mass media focused on them” (336). Mills wherefore presents two points of scenery regarding the existence of right elite: those who do not believe that power elite exists and those who believe that it exists barely because historical situations bespeaking that decisions are being made but the clean and ordinary citizen did not make that decision (333). However, Mills then argues that there are institutions that do in fact unite the decisions made and the historical dismantlets that show those decisions (334).\r\n And even if one will argue that high baseball club is also ruled by religious, educational and familial institutions, Mills gives that although these institutions are present and working in society, they are just but the means of the too large three[1] to legitimize its power and decisions (334). In fact, Mills argues that if the littler institutions do not go about the row laid down by the big three, then the big three ignore always do something to change the structure of smaller institutions so as to fit their plans and decisions (334-335).\r\nIn the end, Mills wraps up his article with the conclusion that there are those extraordinary men in the three biggest potent institutions in society that dictate its course and that although they are not solitudinarian rulers (333), it is just through them that power â€Å"can be more than than or slight continuous and classical” (336). And these men are so powerful that their wills are followed and realized even if others resist it (336).\r\n The second article is Diversity in the Power Elite by Richard Zweigenhaft and G. Wi lliam Domhoff, wherein the authors concluded that â€Å"power elite is more than a set of institutional leaders” (338). The authors attack the view of C. Wright Mills that society is not pluralistic and that it is controlled only by a handful through a research on whether the three major institutional hierarchies feel become diversified over the geezerhood since Mills’ theory. And the answer is yes. The authors’ research showed that the power elite have been diversified through the presence of more women and minorities (339).\r\nThe research and shows that although there is mixture in the powerful, there are many things that have not changed. For one, the core group of the elite is still preponderantly Christian white males and many groups that contributed to diversification hang on underrepresented (339). Two, â€Å"high social origins continue to be a distinct advantage” and those who are able to flick the major institutions play the game ac cording to the rules that have been followed since time immemorial (339).\r\nLastly, the acceptance of diversity was only a result of â€Å"pressure from activists and feminists” (339). The article further discussed that although there was diversification in the power elite, the diversity only ends with the gender or race of the person. In fact, diversity strengthened the power elite even more because it â€Å"held the same values and perspective as those who are al renty in power” (340). In the end, diversification did not disprove the existence of the power elite, as enunciated by Mills, but only expand its membership.\r\n The last article is by Louis Desipio and Rodolfo O. De La Garza entitle Forever Seen as New: Hispanic date in American Elections wherein it proposes that the growing importance of the Hispanic electorate in American elections is a result, not of Latino mobilization, but of following an Anglo pattern where the more ameliorate and e conomically advantaged are the ones who vote (346).\r\nThe article presents the impediments to a more active Latino electorate: being young, less well- meliorate, low incomes, and not being American citizens (343, 344). These impediments have been remedied somehow by the emergence of â€Å" saucy-made cellular telephone Latino elites and new institutions” comprised of young and well-educated Latinos (345). This new cadre exposes Latino issues which enable politicians to address them with more knowledge (345). As a result, although development in Latino participation will be slow, the new cadre will prove to be influential as it is the voice of the Latino community.\r\n With the three articles read and analyzed side by side, the most and keystone concept is power elite. Mills defines the power elite as the concentration of societal power and puzzle out in a few. It is often comprised of the highly educated and wealthy pot who occupy high posts in either t he economic, governmental or military institutions.\r\nThe article of Zweigenhaft and Domhoff proves that although there is a move to further metamorphose the power elite, there is still only a handful who dictate the course of society as the newcomers hardly have proposed major changes, and in fact settle for playing the game the way the power elite has played it ever since. The article of Desipio and De La Garza is not any different since it discusses the concentration of Latino electoral participation in the young and well-educated. At the end of the day, Mills’ concept has expanded but not altered in any way.\r\n With the three readings main theme of power in the few, I was awakened to the possibility that there really competency be just a few people who are running our country through the economy, politics, and the military. I realized that family, education and religion are not even major powerhouses but do play some role in putting the power elite in their positions. Those who are wealthy and had the probability to graduate from ivy-league and other elite schools are sensed as the people who know a can and could probably make the right decisions for the country.\r\nAs a result of this thinking, they are placed in positions that condense the correct actions for their institutions. But I cannot entirely concede that that diversification has not changed anything in the power elite and that the newcomers have not changed anything in society. Gender and racial issues are core agenda in society today although it must be noted that minorities are still that: minorities. It is still the rich, the smart and the popular who are in a state of power and influence. How else can you justify Arnold Schwarchenegger winning the gubernatorial seat?\r\n[1] Economic, political and military institutions\r\n'