Capital Punishment Essay: Death Penalty Not Consistent with Democracy

Death penalization Not Consistent with Democracy Many laws consider a turn over detestation more serious than a crime of pure violence. only if what then is large(p) punishment but the most premeditated of murders, to which no criminals deed, however calculated it may be, can be comp atomic number 18d? For there to be equivalence, the finale penalty would have to punish a criminal who had warned his victim of the date at which he would inflict a horrible shoemakers last on him and who, from that moment onward, had confined him at his mercy for years. The Council of Europe declares, The death penalty can no longer be regarded as an congenial form of punishment from a human rights perspective. It is an arbitrary, discriminatory and irreversible secondment when judicial errors, which can never be entirely ruled out, cannot be reversed. In fact, the Council went so far as to create a communications protocol No. 6 in 1983, which destroyed capital punishment in peacetime. e very(prenominal) new member states must ratify this legislation and, so far, 39 of the 41 member states of the council have d iodin so. Nonetheless, 17 years after(prenominal) the Council of Europe adopted Protocol No. 6, the coupled States remains one of the few staunch Western defenders of capital punishment. Both mainstream Presidential candidates in the United States firmly supported the death penalty, and one candidate, George W. Bush, personally sign(a) off on 35 executions in 1999 while governor of Texas. wherefore has capital punishment, which has been condemned by most Western democracies, continued to have such(prenominal) strong support in the United States? Obviously, Europe and the United States are very different places, but it is ... ...ms cited by the Council as justification for the abolishment of capital punishment remain unaddressed in the United States today. working capital punishment is still arbitrary, discriminatory, and irreversible in America. Ye t, despite these, and other, compelling reasons to abolish capital punishment, our nation still defends this barbaric, uncivilized and cruel practice. To many Americans, capital punishment is a quick fix to a national crime problem. We have been willing to overlook the gross injustices of the practice because we have persuade ourselves that it is making America a safer community. Acceptance of this myth must stop. The United States should follow Europes lead and acknowledge that the administration of capital punishment in this country is an inherently unfair judicial practice. We must demand a moratorium on the death penalty in America now.