Psychosocial Stage Essay

mental increase is generally accepted as product of the interaction among social and psychological forces which directly scratch and shape the reputation of each respective(prenominal)istic (Erikson, 2000). This whitethorn as well as encom fly the coop changes in self-control, and prosocial behavior. In relation to this, Erik Erikson established a unifying scheme on the social and psychological aspects of valet reading by means of out(a) behavior span. In his eight maturational introduces, each hotshot-on-one should, from infancy to senescence, accomplish psychological tasks in line with his or her social experiences.In addition, his theory, often called as the stages of man, is primarily grounded on the notion that every individual develops self-images through separates perceptions and his or her throw perceptions (Erikson, 2000). Erikson described the development of genius and the process by which an individual stupefys societal role and shapes his or her i dentity. In contrary to Freuds psychosexual emphasis, Erickson accentuated the development of ones attitudes, skills, and the guts of responsibility.Further, Erikson argued that individuals suffer the different developmental stages, each with crisis or dilemma, and expected to resolve peculiar(prenominal) scrap in every stage. Unresolved conflicts in the previous stage will pass on the succeeding stages which impart cast out distinctions in ones individual(prenominal)ity (Erikson, 2000). On the former(a) hand, as an individual winnerfully confronted every developmental crisis, he or she achieves positive traits or psychological attri yetes. Generativity versus Stagnation Erikson viewed development as a continuous process of facing the complexities of behavior (Santrock, 2002).A untested pro, for example, to ensure success and intimate relations, he or she must perceive and accomplish the task of creating and condole with his or her purportspan role or style. Ericksons 7th stage of psychosocial development, generativity versus doldrums, coincides with the inwardness due date stopover of humans. As be by Erikson, generativity is the desire to take an alert role in establishing the society and nurturing the offspring to ensure the continuity of human contemporaries (Lerner, 2002).In this stage, individuals should develop concern for the near generation in order to rule out personal stagnation (Santrock, 2002). While approximately individuals accomplish this through active community of interests meanment and participation, or so ease up for the eudaemonia of the society through responsible pargonnthood. In each means, the dynamic that must be passed is the outward shifting from the offbeat of ones self to the experimental condition and assist for the humanity. As such, the strength of care is achieved through creating, parenting, volunteering, and mentoring.For instance, by means of good care and concern, the generative religious teachers give littleons traditional religious view on development. Generative braggart(a)s, on the other hand, may take responsibility on the musical rhythm of life by leading and point their children in the first five stages of psychosocial development (Santrock, 2002). Meanwhile, a key element of generativity versus stagnation is the continuity of stages and cumulative implications of various experiences in life (Santrock, 2002). The adults sense of generativity is stimulated by encouraging and raiseing the future of the adjoining generation.However, individuals who fail to bestow the continuity to the undermentioned generation may perhaps start out engorge with his or her personal need, leave out the needs of other individuals, and finally live stagnated. Influences on my Personality The psychosocial development constructs of Erickson encompasses every experience of an individual that processes and shapes his or her personality, generativity, and perceptions. The se processes are deemed universal that is, although individuals experience family, social, and cultural life differently, the variations are minor.The minor variations account for other individual variables such as socioeconomic status, age, race, g abrogateer, ethnicity, religion, education, and culture (Lerner, 2002). Hence, the psychosocial processes in the midriff maturity show variations on themes but of interchangeable dynamic of change. Erikson outlined these changes in every developmental stage through specific conflicts or tasks that one needs to check to or resolve. As such in halfway adulthood, generativity versus stagnation is the conflict that needs to be resolved.However, as the resolution of conflicts in the early adulthood plays this stage, the outcome in this stage will directly affect the late adulthood level (Lerner, 2002). As well, as individuals are expected to furnish inspiration, care, and guidance for the youth, they are withal challenged to acquire creative roles for the societal development and continuity. Generativity thence should not notwithstanding be control in parenting but should stretch out to community involvements through projects, leadership, and commitment.It must be deemed with respect to the manner by which an individual handle his or her relations with his or her family, societal institutions, friends, relatives, and with other individuals. Whereas every social behavior is determined by innumerable of factors, the commitment and concern for the social offbeat of the bordering generation must be the original motivation in all those aforementioned(prenominal) social responsibilities and activities (Lerner, 2002). As I learned the lay adulthood psychosocial stage of Erikson, roughly 35-40 years of ages, I examined the demonstrate ground of my personality in terms of generativity and stagnation.That is, I assessed my self if I am productive in my field of endeavor and adapt towards inspiring and m anoeuver my children and other youngsters and young adults. I became concern with the achievement of generativity for Erikson argued that it is crucial for a positive outlook during midlife. As such, I formulated my developmental goals of preparing my self for my senescence detail and caring for and guiding the youngsters for adulthood. However, life experiences in this stage of life are not identical among individuals some are still single adult while others are happily espouse or divorced during this period.Generally, the pose adulthood has developmental discontinuity and continuity. In particular, psychological attributes comparable cognitive functioning may chop-chop change while the others such as intelligence and personality may attain stability during midlife (Lachman, 2001). I realized then that in defining lifes success, experiences in midlife have signifi foott roles. During put adulthood, every individual compensates for and make dos with lifes losses which tend to be unvarnished as senescence life approaches.As revealed by psychological researches, life expiation is at its peak in midlife this is the period of life where subjective happiness and eudaimonia are rated best as compared to other stages of life (Lachman, 2001). Thus, midlife is known as the found of ones life, where most middle adults are at the summit of their family and nonrecreational careers, and income generation. In addition, middle adults experience a very satisfactory psychological well-being they have positive outlook in life, autonomy, and aim for both personal and professional growth (Lachman, 2001).They sensed midlife as the period where one should function best. Thus, my consciousness on my work performance, multiple-role playing, and parenting styles were awakened. Nevertheless, at the other essential of middle adulthood are the midlife crises. found on psychological reports, middle adulthood is battered by worries in life such as the feelings of individua ls of life losses and failures, non-achievement and underachievement, and trivial and non-essential goals (Lachman, 2001).Yet, amidst these crises and as compared to other stages of life, middle adulthood is the period of less picture and higher well-being. In this period, most individuals bring home the bacon their professional and personal goals. Those who are persuadable to environmental factors, limited resources, and poverty, are at risk to psychological and physical damage (Lachman, 2001). It was then clarified in my sound judgement that during midlife, individuals may either enjoy the actualisation of their respective labors or suffer the cumulative deficits of their life due to unresolved conflicts in previous stages.Therefore, middle adulthood, as generativity versus stagnation implies, is not that a period of fulfillment and accomplishment but also a transition period for the one-time(prenominal) and present events of life basically influence the later lifes trans ition. Midlife is the stage of life when individuals, more frequently, have already decided for a lifestyle and other social context like vocation, routine, neighborhood, and escort network. Thus, I postulated that personality molds the life of an individual, preferably than life experiences shapes the personality of an individual.In particular, only specific aspect of personality is altered by dramatic life events during middle adulthood. For example, career or marriage failure, grief due to mental or physical disorder, and death of a loved one may alter the behavioral trait of an individual which in turn only causes minor shifts in personality but do not reflect in the holistic personality structure. Moreover, the concept of midlife crisis, perceived as inevitable in middle adulthood, was found to be false (Lerner, 2002). up to now though midlife is a stage of reflection, change magnitude anxiety, midcourse correction, and unpredictable transformation, researches revealed that during middle adulthood, individuals still cut the shifting of life perspective from parturition until to their last years to live (Lerner, 2002). The nature of an individuals response to midlife challenges is generally affected by personality attributes and less by the individuals present developmental stage or chronological age.As proposed, the enduring nature of midlife crisis is possibly related to the capability of an individual to cope with the tragic life events and in the end still considers his or her self as fairly fortunate. In sum, Erikson suggested the importance of decision oneself in another during midlife developmental stage. By merely serving oneself or own family, an individual becomes engorge with his or her personal needs, disregard the needs of other individuals, and eventually ends as stagnated.Hence, I must not confine my self in expression at and working only for the wellbeing of my family. Bringing up my children into the best that they can be is inad equate contribution for the welfare of the society. I need to acquire the sense of altruism in order to contribute whatever resources I have, actively involve myself to community projects, and to extend whatever represent I can give for the welfare of the next generation.In addition, since midlife crisis is inevitable in middle adulthood, I realized that in order to face every travail, empathy and sponsor to others are crucial so as to establish a network support where I can lean on as I resolve any form of midlife crisis. References Erikson, E. H. (2000). The Erik Erikson Reader. Coles, R. Ed. New York Norton. Santrock, J. W. (2002). Life-span development. New York McGraw-Hill. Lachman, M. E. (2001). enchiridion of Midlife Development. New York John Wiley. Lerner, R. M. (2002). Concepts and Theories of Human Development, third ed. Mahwah, NJ Erlbaum.